Statue of Tom Paine at Burnham Park, Morristown, USA
*First published in* The Guardian, UK
"The slow creep of complacency must be resisted. If the rule of law is to mean anything, it is in cases such as these that the case must stand by principle. It must insist that the person affected be told what is alleged against him."
The future of the control order regime for terror suspects was thrown into doubt after a "historic" law lords ruling that it was unlawful to use "secret evidence" to place people under a regime that includes a 16-hour curfew.
The unanimous ruling by a panel of nine judges said it was a fundamental principle that everyone was entitled to the disclosure of sufficient material to enable them to answer effectively the case made against them.
The ruling, led by the senior law lord Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, is expected to lead to the control order regime being allowed to "wither on the vine" as the 20 terror suspects under the regime launch fresh legal challenges in response to the ruling.
It is expected that the security services will decide not to disclose the nature of the secret case against many of the suspects and instead simply allow the control orders to lapse.
The law lords said that unless a suspect was given "sufficient information about the allegations against him to enable him to give effective instructions to the special advocate" – the vetted lawyer supposed to represent their interests at closed hearings – their right to a fair trial under article six of the European convention on human rights would be breached.
As Lord Hope of Craighead put it: "The slow creep of complacency must be resisted. If the rule of law is to mean anything, it is in cases such as these that the case must stand by principle. It mu...
Read more »In the build-up to the 1832 Reform Bill, radical critics of sinecures and rotten boroughs condemned old corruption by tapping political inspiration from figures such as John Milton, the radical Puritans, John Locke and John Wilkes. Faced with our own deepening political recession, a new corruption fuelled by public disaffection with party politics, parliamentary fiddles and rudderless government, where can we turn for inspiration?
Read more »The endorsement of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People on 3 April 2009 is, along with the national apology to the stolen generation, a clear symbolic difference between the Kevin Rudd’s government and John Howard’s on Indigenous policy.
Read more »There has never been a better time to achieve total nuclear disarmament; this is necessary, urgent and feasible. We are at the crossroads of a nuclear crisis. On the one hand, we are at an alarming tipping point on proliferation of nuclear weapons, with a growing risk of nuclear terrorism and use of still massively bloated arsenals of the worst weapons of terror. On the other, we have perhaps the best opportunity to abolish nuclear weapons.
For the first time, a US president has been elected with a commitment to nuclear weapons abolition, and President Barack Obama has outlined a substantive program to deliver on this, and shown early evidence that he is serious. He needs all the support and encouragement in the world. We do not know how long this opportunity will last. Unlike the last one, at the end of the Cold War, it must not be squandered. An increasingly resource- and climate-stressed world is an ever more dangerous place for nuclear weapons. We must not fail.
Read more »Read the findings of the WA Coroner's investigation into the death of a well respected community leader in outback Western Australia who was locked in a metal cell in the back of a prison van and driven through the desert in the searing heat. Four hours later he was dead.
“One of the most urgent problems of today’s world is the danger of nuclear weapons. The unexpected nuclear test by North Korea on May 25 and its test-firing of a series of short-range missiles is the latest, frightening reminder.” Mikhail Gorbachev
An over-reliance on border control was discredited during the years of the Howard Government for two principle reasons. First, it results in excessive cruelty, expense and breaches of human rights. Second, it subtly fuels the trade in people smuggling, whose purveyors know that the market pressure for their 'services' remains while governments make no effort to tackle its causes. From Eureka Street.
Immigration lawyers say a group of 29 asylum seekers who were taken to an oil rig after their boat exploded will not get the same assistance as those who were brought to the Australian mainland for medical help. From ABC Radio’s AM
From The Economist: Peace, love and understanding. Barack Obama proposes a world free of nuclear weapons.
The United Nations Human Rights Committee is calling on the Federal Government to redesign its ‘discriminatory’ intervention into Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory.
Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin has announced a statement of support for the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, reversing the stance of the previous government, which voted against it in 2007. The declaration outlines Indigenous people’s rights in international law, but it is not legally binding and cannot override domestic law.
A national inquiry will provide the first national picture into the health, education, housing and employment barriers experienced by Africans, many of whom came to Australia as traumatised refugees.
A new report from The Australian Human Rights Commission highlights ongoing problems in immigration detention. Commissioner Graeme Innes called on the government to translate its ‘new directions’ for Australia’s immigration detention system into policy, practice and legislative change as soon as possible.
Senator Andrew Bartlett says the human and financial cost of off-shore detention will continue to be enormous, and completely unnecessary. And the suggestion that tormenting innocent people who are already in Australia will somehow be a deterrent to people smugglers is simply a furphy.
Australians All was founded by former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser in 2006 as a website dedicated to opposing all forms of racism and discrimination, selectivity in the application of the law and public policy that seeks to divide or exclude.
Its founding principles include: